Traditional ITAR Compliance Solutions are Broken
Theodosian Directly Addresses Your Four Hardest ITAR Compliance Challenges
Instead of stitching together separate tools for encryption, access control, logging, and geo-blocking, Theodosian handles all four from a single platform.
Achieve ITAR Compliance 10-12x Faster
Survive a DDTC Audit with Confidence
When DDTC conducts a compliance review (triggered by a voluntary disclosure, competitor complaint, or random audit), they'll demand:
How Theodosian Helps You Meet ITAR Requirements
Theodosian applies encryption and context-aware access controls directly to each file. Protection travels with your ITAR data across cloud storage, endpoints, email, and sharing workflows. If access doesn’t meet policy requirements, the file remains encrypted, inaccessible, and compliant.
See How Theodosian Makes ITAR Compliance Faster, Easier, and More Affordable
See how Theodosian enforces ITAR policies at the file level, saving your team both time and money vs traditional solutions like Microsoft GCC High. No data migration required. See results immediately.
Theodosian provides the technical controls, encryption, access enforcement, and audit trails that support ITAR compliance efforts. Full ITAR compliance also requires appropriate organizational policies, procedures, training, and registration with the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC). Theodosian is a critical enabler and can help be the foundation of your ITAR compliance journey, but it is not a complete compliance program.
No. Theodosian connects to your existing cloud storage, SharePoint, Google Drive, Dropbox, network shares, and adds a persistent protection layer on top. You don't need to migrate data, change platforms, or disrupt workflows. Protection is applied where your data already lives and is created.
Yes. Theodosian enforces attribute-based policies and can be tied to your identity provider, allowing you to restrict file access based on U.S. Person status. You can layer additional contextual requirements, approved devices, U.S.-based locations, corporate networks, and require step-up MFA for sensitive files. Access attempts that don't meet all policy conditions are denied in real time.
You can grant a contractor access to specific files for a defined period, from approved devices and locations, with automatic expiration. All access attempts are logged. When the contract ends, or access is revoked, files remain encrypted and unusable, even if they were previously downloaded.
Our zero-knowledge architecture means we cannot decrypt your files, even if our systems were compromised. Your encryption keys are managed using our patented decentralized system, ensuring no unauthorized party (including Theodosian staff, attackers, or third-party service providers) can access your plaintext data. A breach of Theodosian does not result in exposure of your ITAR-controlled technical data.
Microsoft's sensitivity labels provide basic classification and role-based permissions, but they have critical gaps for ITAR. Many contractors use sensitivity labels for classification and Theodosian for enforcement and evidence:
- Microsoft can decrypt your data (they hold tenant keys; not zero-knowledge)
- No U.S. Person-specific enforcement (you can't restrict based on citizenship attributes)
- Limited context awareness (can't enforce device, location, or network policies)
- Weak endpoint protection (files decrypt to plaintext on devices)
- Incomplete audit trails (limited visibility into denied access attempts)
Yes. Theodosian is designed to complement your existing security stack. DLP and Purview provide valuable monitoring and alerting. Theodosian adds the persistent, file-level enforcement layer that prevents unauthorized access even when perimeter controls are bypassed. Many customers use both together for defense-in-depth.
Even "small" violations routinely result in $500K-$2M penalties. The cost of Theodosian is a rounding error compared to a single ITAR violation.
As of 2025, ITAR civil penalties reach $1,271,078 per violation, or twice the transaction value, whichever is greater. A single unauthorized export of technical data can trigger multiple violations (one per file, one per recipient, one per transmission).
Willful ITAR violations carry criminal penalties of up to $1,000,000 per violation and imprisonment for up to 20 years. These aren't just corporate fines—individual employees (including executives) can be personally prosecuted and imprisoned.
ITAR violations can also result in debarment, permanent exclusion from U.S. government contracts, and export activities. Companies lose their ability to compete for DoD work, often resulting in business closure. Individuals convicted face statutory debarment for up to 10 years, effectively ending careers in defense.
Recent real-world examples of fines:
- Swiss Automation, 2025: $400K+ for failure to provide adequate cybersecurity for ITAR-controlled data
- Raytheon, 2024: $950M+ combined criminal and civil penalties for ITAR violations
- Boeing, 2024: $51M civil penalty for unauthorized technical data transfers
- Honeywell, 2021: $13M civil penalty for ITAR export control failures
- Keysight Technologies, 2021: $6.6M civil penalty for 24 unauthorized exports of technical data